SAUL ESLAKE

Economist

SAUL ESLAKE

‘Welcome to my website …
I’m an independent economist, consultant, speaker,
and Vice-Chancellor’s Fellow at the University of Tasmania’

Negative gearing proponents’ claims don’t stack up


Publications, Taxation | 15th March 2016

Saul Eslake | The New Daily | 16th March 2016

Negative gearing policy has been a battleground for many years and its emergence as a hot button issue in the upcoming federal election has brought the friends and enemies of the practice into the field once more.

Some are warning about “unintended consequences” which they say would “inevitably flow” from paring back the practice, which allows investors to write off interest losses on investment property against other income.

That in turn cuts their income tax liability in the present and turns current taxable income into capital gains when the property is eventually sold, which are then taxed at half the rate levied on ordinary income.

• Shorten’s pitch to win over the young … and their parents
• Morrison painting a false picture of negative gearing
• Experts slam Coalition’s negative gearing claims

The Labor opposition has put the issue firmly on the agenda, pledging to end negative gearing on existing housing (and other assets) purchased after July 1 2017, while leaving negative gearing as an option only for buyers of new properties.

Since the policy was announced, negative gearing proponents have hit back. Rents will “soar”, they allege, property prices will be “smashed”, housing starts will decline, and untold damage will be done to the broader economy, they claim.

0316negative-gearing

These assertions are usually based on beliefs about how investors will respond to the removal of negative gearing. They sometimes support their arguments with reference to what allegedly happened when negative gearing was temporarily abolished by the Hawke government between 1985 and 1987.

These assertions don’t survive a moment’s confrontation with the statistical evidence from that period. Even BIS Shrapnel acknowledged that in a final-page addendum to the report they produced earlier this month.

That report attempted to put some numerical meat on the bones of the scare campaign relaunched by defenders of negative gearing and reiterated some of the arguments of the critics of Labor’s policy.

Look at the evidence

But there actually is some more recent evidence which adds weight to the argument that the removal of negative gearing, as envisaged by the Labor Party, will have very few of the effects alleged by this scare campaign.

Over the last five years or so, every state and territory government in Australia – of whatever political complexion – has abolished the grants they have been making to first-time buyers of existing properties introduced since 2000; whilst at the same time increasing (in most case doubling) grants for first-time buyers of new dwellings.

Scott Morrison claims that the vast majority of Australians who use negative gearing earn “modest” incomes.
Scott Morrison and the Coalition have attacked Labor’s negative gearing plans. Photo: AAP
The rationale for these changes has been that grants to first-time buyers of established dwellings serve only to increase the price of those dwellings; whilst restricting grants to those who purchase new dwellings and boosting the grant size, stands at least some chance of directing first-time buyer demand to new dwellings – and thus, potentially, increasing the supply of new housing.

This is exactly the same rationale for Labor’s proposals on negative gearing.

The figures tally up

Moreover, the amounts involved are comparable. First homeowner grants have typically been in the band between $7000-$14,000, a similar range to the average rental interest deduction claimed by landlords with taxable incomes under $80,000.

They are the “police officers, teachers and nurses” who, according to the Property Council and the Treasurer, are the ones doing almost all the ‘negative gearing’.

In other words, what federal Labor proposes with regard to investors, is very similar in its intended effects, to the aims state and territory governments have with regard to first-time owner-occupiers.

Yet there is absolutely no evidence that these changes, which (to repeat) have been made by every state and territory government over the past five years, have had any adverse consequences on the saleability of existing housing, on house prices, or on the supply of new housing.

While it may not represent definitive proof, it is certainly highly suggestive that what Labor is proposing will not have the dire consequences which those seeking to retain negative gearing in its present form allege.

And it is far more persuasive than the assertions which those who wish to retain negative gearing in its present form have thus far brought to bear on the debate.

Saul Eslake is a leading Australian economist. He worked as the Chief Economist at the ANZ for 14 years and has worked at Bank of America-Merrill Lynch. Between 2009 and 2011, he was the Director of the Productivity Growth Program at the Grattan Institute. Visit his official website here.

SPEAKING ENGAGEMENT

Speaking Engagement | Boardroom Advisory | Commissioned Report | Expert Witness



Saul Eslake spoke to Zurich Australia executives and staff at their ‘Accelerate’ conference in Sydney on 9th May 2024, covering short- and longer-term trends in major ‘advanced’ economies, China, India and Australia, with a bit of geo-politics thrown in.



“You are the best economic thinker in the country hands down”

Sheryle Bagwell, recently retired Senior Business Correspondent (and sometime Executive Producer),
ABC Radio National Breakfast


“Just want to congratulate you Saul on the unbelievably good set of slides you just presented, possibly the best I have ever seen. You have set the bar very high.”

Dr Joe Flood, Adjunct Fellow, RMIT University, Pandemicia


“Thank you very much for your excellent presentation for the Economic Society today. It is always a great pleasure to hear your eloquent, up-to-date and comprehensive talks.”

Andrew Trembath, economist, Victorian and Australian Government agencies


Request Speaking Engagement


WHAT'S NEW

Most Recent Articles, Talks and Presentations


The Importance of Productivity – and What to Do About It
Economic Policies, Productivity, The Australian Economy
29th March 2025


The 2025-26 Federal Budget – An Assessment
Economic Policies, The Australian Economy
27th March 2025


What might and might not be in the budget
Economic Policies, News, Recent Media Interview, The Australian Economy
24th March 2025


The Impact of President Trump’s ‘trade war’
Economic Policies, Recent Media Interview, The Australian Economy, The Global Economy, US Economy Video
18th March 2025


Potential Risks in the Australian Share Market
Economic Policies, Economic Video, Recent Media Interview, The Australian Economy, The Global Economy
18th March 2025


Questions for Australia’s Defence in a Changed World (Part 3)
Australian Society and Politics, Economic Video, Security
17th March 2025


Victoria joins the ranks of so-called ‘mendicant’ states
Australian Society and Politics, Economic Policies, News
16th March 2025


Erratic US Trade Policy
Economic Policies, Globalization, Recent Media Interview, The Global Economy, US Economy Video
15th March 2025


Questions for Australia’s Defence in a Changed World
Australian Society and Politics, Economic Video, Security
14th March 2025


Questions for Australia’s Defence in a Changed World (Part 2)
Australian Society and Politics, Economic Video, Security
14th March 2025


Podcast: Tasmania’s Debt Dilemma
Economic Policies, Economic Video, Tasmania
13th March 2025


The impact of Trump’s tariff and other policies
Economic Policies, News, Recent Media Interview, The Global Economy, US Economy Video
13th March 2025


What could be in the Federal Budget 2025-2026?
Australian Society and Politics, Economic Policies, News, Recent Media Interview, The Australian Economy
12th March 2025


Tasmania’s Debt Dilemma
Economic Policies, Tasmania
12th March 2025


The real meaning of last November’s US elections is becoming clearer – the American people voted for this
Australian Society and Politics, News, Security, The Australian Economy, The Global Economy
9th March 2025


NEWS

TV, Radio & Print Media


What might and might not be in the budget
Economic Policies, News, Recent Media Interview, The Australian Economy | 24th March 2025

Victoria joins the ranks of so-called ‘mendicant’ states
Australian Society and Politics, Economic Policies, News | 16th March 2025

The impact of Trump’s tariff and other policies
Economic Policies, News, Recent Media Interview, The Global Economy, US Economy Video | 13th March 2025

What could be in the Federal Budget 2025-2026?
Australian Society and Politics, Economic Policies, News, Recent Media Interview, The Australian Economy | 12th March 2025

The real meaning of last November’s US elections is becoming clearer – the American people voted for this
Australian Society and Politics, News, Security, The Australian Economy, The Global Economy | 9th March 2025

Werribee voters send messages to both major Victorian political parties
Australian Society and Politics, Economic Policies, News | 9th March 2025

Review of the case for privatization of Tasmanian Government business enterprises
Economic Policies, News, Recent Media Interview, Tasmania | 6th March 2025

Tasmania’s Public Finances
& the Independent Review of Tasmania’s State Finances (Aug, 2024)

News, Recent Media Interview, Tasmania | 14th February 2025

How Victoria became one of Australia’s ‘poor states’
Economic Policies, News, Publications, The Australian Economy | 25th November 2024

Negative Gearing
Economic Policies, Housing, News, Recent Media Interview, Taxation | 26th September 2024

Tasmania’s State Budget 2024 – 2025 with Leon Compton
News, Recent Media Interview, Tasmania | 13th September 2024

Solutions to Australia’s Housing Crisis
Australian Society and Politics, Housing, News, Recent Media Interview | 11th September 2024

Read more

VIDEO

Most Recent Multimedia


TESTIMONIALS

What Others Say


Australian Minister for Housing, the Hon. Clare O'Neill MP on ABC Q&A, September 2024

“We are lucky as a State to have an economist of your calibre willing to readily make yourself available to give us a clea r perception of where we are at and the direction we need to go for a better future”
Diplomatic Representative, August 2024

“You are one of the best at what you do in the world”
Gail Fosler, Chief Economist, The Conference Board, New York, December 2002

“I have never known an economist to have such a knowledge of world economic facts and to be able to bring to bear so much information in answering a question without notice”
Charles Goode, Chairman, ANZ Bank, July 2009

“Saul Eslake is … a highly regarded independent economist with the highest degree of integrity"
John Durie, Columnist, The Australian, July 2009

“… one of the few people in this world who can have so many oranges up in the air at the same time but still manage to catch them"
Andrew Clark, journalist, Australian Financial Review, November 2008

Read more

LINKS

Useful Links


Below is a list of links I’ve found useful under the following broad topics

Read more